top of page

Employee vs Contractor for Lawyers: What the ATO Actually Looks At

  • 6 days ago
  • 3 min read

For Brisbane law firms, engaging lawyers as contractors can seem like a practical solution. More flexibility. Lower fixed costs. Scalable capacity.


But when it comes to the ATO, what matters isn’t what you call someone. It’s what the working relationship looks like.


With increased scrutiny around contractor arrangements across professional services, Brisbane legal practices need to ensure their structure would withstand review, particularly where Queensland payroll tax may also apply.

 

Why Misclassification Is a Risk for Brisbane Law Firms

Misclassifying a lawyer as a contractor can trigger:

  • Superannuation back payments

  • PAYG withholding liabilities

  • Queensland payroll tax exposure

  • Interest and penalties

  • Potential Fair Work claims


Even where both parties agree to a contractor arrangement, the ATO applies a substance over label approach.

For Brisbane firms, this risk is heightened where contractor models are used for senior associates, consultants or percentage based arrangements.

 

The Key Factors the ATO Considers

There is no single test. The ATO assesses the totality of the relationship.

1. Control

Who controls how the legal work is performed?

If the firm dictates:

  • Working hours (e.g. 8:30-5:30 in the Brisbane CBD office)

  • Where work must be performed

  • How matters are managed

  • Internal policies and billing procedures


This leans towards employment.

A genuine contractor typically has greater autonomy in how services are delivered.

 

2. Ability to Delegate

Can the lawyer subcontract or delegate the work?

A true contractor generally has the right to:

  • Delegate to another suitably qualified lawyer

  • Bear the cost of that delegation


If the individual must personally perform all work, this points more toward employment.

In legal practice, professional responsibility obligations can complicate this. This is why many Brisbane contractor models unintentionally resemble employment.

 

3. Commercial Risk

Who bears the financial risk?

Contractors typically:

  • Invoice the firm

  • Carry their own professional indemnity insurance

  • Rectify defects at their own cost

  • Manage profitability


Employees are paid regardless of matter margins and do not assume business risk.

 

4. Tools, Systems and Integration

Does the lawyer operate independently, or are they integrated into the firm?

Indicators of integration include:

  • Firm email address

  • Listing on the firm website as staff

  • Use of firm letterhead

  • Access to support staff and systems

  • Representing the firm as “we”


The more integrated the lawyer is into the Brisbane practice, the more likely the relationship resembles employment.

 

Superannuation: A Major Risk Area

Even if a lawyer is considered a contractor at common law, they may still be deemed an employee for superannuation purposes under the expanded definition in the Superannuation Guarantee legislation.

Superannuation may be payable if the contractor:

  • Is paid mainly for their labour

  • Is required to perform the work personally

  • Is not paid to achieve a specific result


This is one of the most common exposure points we see in Brisbane professional practices.

 

Queensland Payroll Tax Considerations

For Brisbane law firms, payroll tax adds another layer of complexity.

Queensland payroll tax provisions can apply to contractor payments where the arrangement is deemed “relevant contract” provisions under state legislation.


Even if a lawyer is a legitimate contractor for ATO purposes, payroll tax may still apply.


This is often overlooked and can create unexpected liabilities for growing firms.

 

Common Risk Areas We See in Brisbane Legal Practices

  • Senior lawyers converted to “contractors” but operating exactly as before

  • Percentage-of-billings arrangements with full integration into the firm

  • Outdated contractor agreements

  • No superannuation review under the expanded definition

  • No payroll tax assessment completed


These arrangements can work but only when properly structured.

 

What Brisbane Law Firms Should Do Now

If your firm engages lawyers as contractors:

  1. Review your written agreements

  2. Compare contract terms to actual working conditions

  3. Assess superannuation exposure separately

  4. Review Queensland payroll tax implications

  5. Document your position and reasoning


Addressing this proactively is significantly less costly than responding to an ATO or OSR review.

 

For Brisbane law firms, contractor arrangements can be commercially effective but only when structured carefully and reviewed regularly.


If you’re unsure whether your current lawyer contractor arrangements would withstand scrutiny, now is the time to assess them.

 

Book a Discovery Call with Rise and we’ll assess your current arrangements, identify exposure areas and outline practical next steps tailored to your firm.



Recent Posts

See All
Common Tax Deductions Lawyers Often Miss

Whether you’re a partner, associate, barrister or running your own practice, understanding the deductions available to legal professionals can make a meaningful difference at tax time. Here are some o

 
 

Subscribe to our newsletter

bottom of page